Carlos Sainz Jnr, McLaren, Monza, 2020

Perez “deserves to be in F1 as much as anyone” – Sainz

RaceFans Round-up

Posted on

| Written by

In the round-up: Carlos Sainz Jnr hopes Sergio Perez finds a way to remain in Formula 1 after his contract was cut short by Racing Point.

What they say

Sainz responded to Thursday’s confirmation that Sebastian Vettel will replace Perez at Racing Point next year, when the team becomes Aston Martin.

I think Sebastian is a great guy, great driver. To keep him in Formula 1 was definitely good news. I obviously feel for Checo. I get on very well with him and I think he deserves to be in Formula 1 as much as anyone else. Let’s hope Checo can also find a good drive next year.

Quotes: Dieter Rencken

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Social media

Notable posts from Twitter, Instagram and more:

Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free

Comment of the day

Koddamn weighed in on the question of whether Racing Point had made a mistake in dropping what McLaren boss Zak Brown described as the ‘higher performing’ Perez.

History has shown F1 teams prioritise pay drivers over talent. Lance Stroll is a pay driver, and Racing Point could do much worse. I don’t see Williams getting any heat for hiring Latifi.

But I think a lot of commenters find something especially wrong with Stroll, because his father owns the team. Which is very interesting, to me, as I don’t consider Stroll any different than a traditional pay driver, in fact, I rate him higher because he is actually decent.
Koddamn

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Mark, Striay, Gex and Frieda!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

Author information

Hazel Southwell
Hazel is a motorsport and automotive journalist with a particular interest in hybrid systems, electrification, batteries and new fuel technologies....

Got a potential story, tip or enquiry? Find out more about RaceFans and contact us here.

25 comments on “Perez “deserves to be in F1 as much as anyone” – Sainz”

  1. about the cameras… at one point production tried some ‘close-up’ shakey cam, bit late finding the car, delayed zooom. maybe trying to emulate ‘old feel’. please don’t try again. it was just distracting, amateurish, trying too hard to be aloof.
    one bourne film was enough for that ‘action filming’ style

    1. one of f1’s current lowpoints is the camera work. not new, anyone can go watch some old ish laps on youtube. this weekend any time lewis or max goes out the camera zooms so much you can end up not seeing a single wheel. like watching radio.

  2. When you watch those bikes go down that start finish straight at full speed, over the painted band by the pit lane it is one of the most exhilarating experience and the camera angles used convey that spectacle to the viewer. F1 has always had a different perspective on conveying the action to the viewer.

    1. Last years MotoGP race at this very track was insanely exciting with 3 riders fighting for the win to the line. Camera work from MotoGp certainly helps a lot unlike the boring coverage of F1.

  3. I once had dinner with the TV producer of some of the Australian Grands Prix in Adelaide. He told me that every sponsor is guaranteed “X” number of minutes & seconds screen time under Bernie’s rules. This led to the rather boring head-on long shots where the cars hardly appear to be moving, but the banner ads are prominent and on-screen for quite a long time.

    Having said that, this is a head-on shot to remember: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZFtIclOdYg at 3:35.

    1. No wonder in the 2015 Japanese GP, the Mercedes had almost no screen time in qualifying. I remember that session, and Hamilton and Rosberg were closely matched in terms of pace, and in the final minutes, we only saw Bottas’ lap instead of the Mercedes battling it out. Here is more to that: https://www.racefans.net/2015/09/27/did-fom-give-mercedes-its-invisible-treatment-in-japan/

      It appears that this has even been traced back to 2012. So, it’s no surprise that during and under Ecclestone, the sport did have some rules of selection of tv coverage.

      1. @krichelle I had forgotten this thing about the 2015 Japanese GP. Otherwise, I remember this race, just not that Mercedes would’ve received particularly less world feed coverage compared to the rest of the 2015 events.

    2. I think Catalunya is the worst example. MotoGP has about 6 different camera views between turns 9 to 12. F1 had one basic view of turns 9 to 12 with the camera stationed at the exit of 12, The Rolex Bridge remaining in centre shot for the majority of that sequence.

  4. The Kimi from the early 2000s, very, very fast driver.

  5. Perez is like many other drivers. There comes a point regardless of your success that you find there is no more place for you at this level. Even the best get screwed over. It happens. F1 sort of expects you to walk away often before your ready. Do it with dignity and maybe you’ll get picked up by another team and maybe you also have to accept being replaced. Nothings new here and there are far too many who want your seat and don’t really care if your loss is their gain. I was a fan of Piquet and as he faced his later years in the sport Senna showed up and like Perez, Nelson no longer had a place and chose to end his career at Indy.
    But what is lousy is a good driver loses his seat in the big dollar game of acquiring sponsorship investment by rolling the dice what could be or what might come. Perez in the end will be nothing more than just a part of the puzzle that grew to become Alpine. It’s all about dollars.

  6. Regarding the Reuters-post, even though the link doesn’t work:
    Unfortunately for Gasly, AT isn’t a team for a long-term stay, so if he doesn’t get a chance to rejoin RBR, he’s going to have to leave the RB camp altogether to remain in F1 as a regular race driver a la Sainz.

    I like how Russell could manage the multitasking of focusing on both the driving and a lap explanation. Yes, he wasn’t doing a 100% push lap, but still. Similar to what Gasly did at Circuit Paul Ricard in 2018: https://youtu.be/DBWQLZPkIWc

    1. Well if a driver isn’t capable of talking someone through a lap, that driver wouldn’t become an F1 driver.

      1. @SadF1fan Talking for a few seconds on a straight is different from talking throughout a lap, though.

        1. Not at that skill level and especially when you are not driving flat out.

    2. @jerejj apologies, that was me dropping a ” or something somewhere, the link works now

  7. Bumper round up today! Great stuff

  8. They could set up an F1 team for the all the old folks deservant of having a place in F1, even doh they have barely performed their entire career in F1.

    1. Why just a single team, you can set up a whole championship and call it Formula E or Indycar.

  9. I forgot MotoGP race at Mugello.

    Hold on a minute, I thought bikes needed acres of all-tarmac run-offs?

    1. They do, unless the barriers are to close, then gravel. So the occasional rider and bike do bounce over the barriers with gravel, as you can see on youtube.

  10. Watching the F3, its crazy how much they are using the run off out of the last corner. The racing line appears to be first off track, then part of the pitlane entrance.

  11. Kick out Bottas and get him in the Merc. At least he might challenge Ham, instead of letting him run away with these empty championships.

  12. Still not sold on Stroll. If anything last weekend made me even less keen on him considering he had arguably the best chance and best machine to take a victory and blew it at the first corner, and then further messed it up a few corners later. I’m sure you could argue inexperience but he’s not exactly ‘new’ to F1, and his experiences of the running at the very front are arguably a little higher than Gasly & Sainz who did fine.

    He’s not bad, no. But he’s not good, either. He’s one of those drivers who if the machine allows, will score victories and poles and the like, but if next to someone even slightly better he’ll never see any of them. Opportunistic and semi-regular points scorer, but nothing more.

  13. Would be fine if he stays in F1, but I wouldn’t mind an IndyCar switch…or WEC.

Comments are closed.