In the round-up: Sharp words between Fernando Alonso and Pirelli over the current tyres.
Links
Your daily digest of F1 news, views, features and more.
Alonso criticises Pirelli tyres (BBC)
Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembery: “I can only suggest [Alonso] goes to ask the soon-to-be four-times champion how to get the best from the same tyres.”
Sauber rule out Barrichello for race seat (Reuters)
Monisha Kaltenborn: “I am ruling out that he would drive for us. Maybe it is better if one is that clear about it.”
Whitmarsh: No Hulkenberg talks (Sky)
“I expect things to work out with Sergio [Perez]. We’re not talking to Nico. He’s doing a good job and certainly deserves a competitive seat next year, but we’re not talking to Nico at the moment.”
Raikkonen says tyre change hurt form (Autosport)
“For me, it was definitely better qualifying on the other tyres, they were a bit more sharp on the front end.”
In Formula One, a Grip Not Easily Loosened (The New York Times)
“While crediting Ecclestone for using his ‘dictatorial style’ to globalise the sport and swell its wealth, Whitmarsh said that the fear that one-man rule has generated has inhibited discussion of the sport’s future. ‘Nobody wants to talk about it openly, because it’s disrespectful of Bernie and because we learned years ago that speaking disrespectfully of Bernie is not good for business,’ he said.”
Korean GP future up in air: promoter (The Japan Times)
“Acting promoter Park Won-hwa said it will be difficult for the event to continue unless F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone makes major concessions on the hosting fee and other terms.”
Fighting to survive: Could this be the last Korean GP?
“An official sign on entry to the Korean International Circuit reads ‘Thank you Mr Ecclestone for the 2013 Korean Grand Prix,’ but cynics think something this toadying is unlikely to facilitate is the cut in fees that the financially imperilled circuit owners are seeking.”
F1 generates excitement in Korea (The Korea Times)
“Under its contract with F1, Yeongam hosts three more GPs after this one until 2016. It remains to be seen whether there will be an F1 event in Korea after that as the GP has been a crippling money loser for the small South Jeolla Province town.”
Ferrari F138 – aero updates (F1)
“In Korea, Ferrari have introduced these small, C-shaped turning vanes at the lower leading edge of the F138’s sidepods.”
Sir Jackie Stewart pays tribute to old mate Francois Cevert (Daily Star)
Tweets
Lot's of things have being said this week about a possible F1 return. The truth is: " if there is an opportunity, I 'm in,"
— Rubens Barrichello (@rubarrichello) October 5, 2013
Vettel's pole position was the 208th powered by a Renault engine, meaning they've tied Ferrari for the all-time record. #F1 @RenaultSportF1
— F1 Fanatic (@f1fanatic_co_uk) October 5, 2013
Current radar of typhoon #FITOW off NE Taiwan. Just as well this didn't go to Mokpo… the race wouldn't have run. pic.twitter.com/eMhJ8AkLvM
— Ian Fergusson (@fergieweather) October 5, 2013
Just asked Whitmarsh about non-driver changes ahead of 2014. He said McLaren had made some signings "which will be headline-grabbing"
— Tom Cary (@tomcary_tel) October 5, 2013
Ganassi also noted that "Ron Dennis didn't let Montoya test for me, and I wasn't even running against him."
— Jenna Fryer (@JennaFryer) October 5, 2013
- Find more official F1 accounts to follow in the F1 Twitter Directory
Comment of the day
Marks will be disappointed by Whitmarsh’s comments on Nico Hulkenberg:
I’m actually quite upset by Hulkenberg not having already been signed. I like Hulkenberg because of his pole in Brazil 2010, that drive in Brazil 2012 and his qualifying and drive recently at Monza. I jumped off my couch in 2010 I was so excited.
Esteban Gutierrez is improving but he’s not got a pole or even close. Hulk did get soundly beaten by Rubens in 2010 yet got that pole. It’s that something extra that Ricciardo, Vergne, Grosjean, Massa, Di Resta, Sutil, Gutierrez and Bottas don’t have (or haven’t demonstrated up to this point). Even Perez showed something last year, which deservedly got him a better ride.
Is it possible that the big teams are afraid of Hulkenberg? That he’s got the potential to out qualify the big four? in any case, I honestly believe Hulkenberg in the same machine (Lotus) could put the car ahead of Webber and achieve third without the help of a Webber grid penalty.
Marks
From the forum
Happy birthday!
Happy birthday to Gaston_Pdu!
If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.
On this day in F1
Francois Cevert lost his life 40 years ago today when he crashed during practice for the United States Grand Prix at Watkins Glen.
Cevert was poised to take over from Jackie Stewart as team leader at Tyrrell. Stewart was due to retire following what would have been his 100th start, but withdrew following Cevert’s death.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 0:09
Incredibly unprofessional response from Hembery. It seems F1 is filled by big children instead of the most professional personal of each discipline in the world.
I understand they’re frustraded by the way everybody has complained about their tyres, and how this season has made them the laughing stock of motorsport, but he should
1) take it with the true culprits, Ecclestone and the FIA
2) handle the comments with A LOT more tact
Also interesting to hear Alonso complaining about the tyres degrading too much, wasn’t Ferrari one of the teams who opposed to switching to less-degrading tyres? Interesting how the complaints change sides.
Anyways, whe shouldn’t have this situation. Hope Ecclestone gets over his foolish ideal of turning F1 into the WWE and let Pirelli make decent tyres, so we can, at least, have driving pushing to the max, which is what most of us like the most.
Fer no.65 (@fer-no65)
6th October 2013, 0:14
@silence what surprises me more is why didn’t Hembery asnwer to critics the same way when Ferrari and Lotus were getting what they wanted in the first part of the season and the others didn’t.
I didn’t hear him saying to Vettel: “go ask current WDC leader how to get the best from the same tyres”
It really was a totally unprofessional answer. It’s hard to overlook that Lotus and Ferrari were obviously the losers since the change, and they will be critical about it, but there are plenty of ways to respond to criticism…
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 0:47
@fer-no65
Not really surprising, he’s probably much more frustrated now than what he was earlier in the season.
Jon Sandor (@jonsan)
6th October 2013, 1:43
That would have sounded pretty odd, as Vettel was the then current WDC leader.
I do recall Hembery saying “Of course we could fix the tyres but then Red Bull would win and we don’t want that”, which was a lot more unprofessional of him than telling Alonso to buck up.
Red Andy (@red-andy)
6th October 2013, 6:31
Not quite. He said that Pirelli had to be careful about making changes that might be seen to benefit certain teams. That obviously meant Red Bull, because they were Chief Whiners at the time.
Of course, Pirelli then went on to make changes to the tyres to benefit Red Bull, and the rest is history … or would be, if anyone could look back on it without falling asleep.
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
6th October 2013, 6:46
@red-andy They didn’t make the (post-Silverstone) changes “to benefit Red Bull”, they made them because people thought tyres exploding and pieces of metal flying at drivers’ head was not a good thing. And I think that’s far enough.
Red Andy (@red-andy)
6th October 2013, 6:56
@keithcollantine Sorry, I don’t agree. Some post-Silverstone changes were obviously necessary, but could have been less drastic (eg banning tyre-swapping and under pressurising without changing the construction) if Pirelli were concerned with preserving sporting integrity. But they took the opportunity to appease the whiners and their efficient PR campaign against the tyres. If Silverstone had not happened, it would have been necessary to invent it.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 8:10
@red-andy Both material science and tyre design are extremely complex topics. I’m quite curious about what puts you in a position to disagree with Pirelli’s decision (decision that was backed by every team, btw).
It’s easy to jump to conclusions, especially if we feel our prefered driver/team has been wronged, but it’s good to remember every now and then how little we know about certain things.
I’m also quite curious about what makes you think Pirelli would make themselves the laughing stock of motorsport in order to please Red Bull, of all teams, especiall considerying Pirelli has huge deals outside F1 with McLaren, Ferrari and Mercedes, so I’m kinda curious what could Pirelli win from all this.
Red Andy (@red-andy)
6th October 2013, 10:36
@silence Your argument from authority is weak. I disagree with Pirelli’s decision, as I stated, because it lacks sporting integrity. It was unfair on the teams who had done a good job and rewarded the teams who had not.
As for how Pirelli benefited from the change, clearly an aggressive PR campaign waged against them was always going to be damaging to their reputation outside the sport (which is important for far more than deals with a couple of road car manufacturers). They took an opportunity to stop the whining as well as making changes on the grounds of safety.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 14:58
@silence
Maybe, but it way stronger than suggesting that less drasti changes would have been enough without having any remote idea of all the science involved.
With limited testing, not even the teams or Pirelli would know if less drastic changes would have sufficed. So don’t attempt to make claims you’re clearly in no position to make.
It was unfair on the teams who had done a good job and rewarded the teams who had not.
It sure was. But such is life. It was either that or drivers threatening not to drive due to safety concerns.
Just putting an “I disagree” will not make your argument any less weak.
And the changes didn’t happen until tyres exploded. That’s not “appeasing the whiners”, it is doing the only rational thing possible.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 15:02
Above post meant to @red-andy
Colossal Squid (@colossal-squid)
6th October 2013, 0:18
Agreed. Pirelli are part of how the sport is run. Of course drivers are going to complain and be critical of the tyres. Hembery needs to get some thicker skin or learn how to rise above the criticism, a witty reply doesn’t sound as smart as he thinks it does.
Hamilfan (@hamilfan)
6th October 2013, 4:29
Whoever thought of degrading tyres as a means of improving excitement must be damn crazy . Me, I’, glad that there will be lesser tyre gimmicks come 2014 or at least I assume .
@HoHum (@hohum)
6th October 2013, 0:46
This whole tyre gimmick has been a disaster right from the beginning, although quite a lot of less experienced fans initially were enthusiastic, mostly because the temperature lottery made mid-pack teams accidental winners. RBR do seem to have found the right balance between speed and degradation but even so tyre management is going to ruin this race.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 0:53
@hohum Indeed. While some Ferrari fans have complained the tyre change hurt Ferrari a lot since they were competitive with them, the fact of the matter is, those tyres should never have been used in the first place. It was a massive mistake by both the FIA and Ecclestone, and has done little more than bring ridicule to everybody involved.
DJ
6th October 2013, 2:46
Allow people to speak their minds. Too much of political correctness is translating to bland sports personalities. Those Rush days seemed so much more exciting – Lauda, Hunt et. al
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 6:05
We need to go beyond the notion that manners, sportmanship and political correctness is boring. All the childish insults and passive agressiveness is a poor distraction and has nothing to do with actual sport.
Jake (@jakehardyf1)
6th October 2013, 5:49
Ecclestone doesnt like the level of degredation. Its basically JUST the FIA
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 6:06
It was Ecclestone himself who asked for high-degrading tyres.
Hamish
6th October 2013, 0:09
No things have being said this week about my employment application to work at McLaren. The truth is: ” if there is an opportunity, I ‘m in,”
We’d all love something we can’t have Rubens.
Joao (@johnmilk)
6th October 2013, 10:11
it seems that we are on the same boat mate…
Mike Dee (@mike-dee)
6th October 2013, 0:12
Is there any driver that has not complained about the tyres in the last three years?
Hamish
6th October 2013, 0:35
Blame yourself, blame the team, or blame the external party everyone else is blaming?
I’d employ the same tactic.
Hairs (@hairs)
6th October 2013, 0:16
Employing random Internet posters sight unseen as technical staff is something which wouldn’t surprise me about the McLaren of today. Sadly.
Hairs (@hairs)
6th October 2013, 0:20
Although it would certainly generate headlines. I can’t think who else McLaren could get in to the team who would generate headlines. The consensus is that the two big brains of the paddock are Newey and brawn, one has everything he wants, the other only wants to be team principal…
Gordon Murray and John Barnard to return? Who knows, McLaren might do anything at this stage.
BasCB (@bascb)
6th October 2013, 6:06
Indeed, the only real headline grabbing one would be if they poached Newey. But we all know that is a lot more unlikely to happen even than Alonso really signing with the team for next year @hairs
Maybe they lured Allison over anyhow, or who knows, James Key? Gascoyne (is he a top one? It would probably bring headlines because of him being pretty involved with Caterhams business)
Hairs (@hairs)
6th October 2013, 9:00
@bascb Gascoyne didn’t make a success of Renault or Toyota or force India. He lasted what, one and a half seasons at Caterham in his bid to “prove the critics wrong” before being moved off to the car division? Definitely something up there.
BasCB (@bascb)
6th October 2013, 9:06
I guess he would get headlines though, but I would not think its a great signing for them, no @hairs
Spawinte (@spawinte)
6th October 2013, 0:30
What?
Hamish
6th October 2013, 0:36
I think Rubens was supposed to reply to my comment.
Hairs (@hairs)
6th October 2013, 8:53
Yes, @hamish, no idea what happened there.
John H (@john-h)
6th October 2013, 0:19
How old is Paul Hembery, 7 years old?
Broom (@)
6th October 2013, 0:26
Maybe Alonso has already asked the soon to be four time world champion how to cope with the Pirelli tyres, and said soon to be four time world champion recommended making as many public complaints as possible as the spineless Pirelli will eventually change their tyre specification and meekly surrender and go back to the old specs.
Of course it also largely depends on Pirelli being competent enough to produce a tyre that can survive grand prix, which they failed to do this year.
And just when you think they couldn’t embarrass themselves further.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 0:51
@brum55
You do know the tyres were changed not because the comments of any driver, but because they exploded in Silverstone, right? You know, people don’t like to drive at 200+ km/h with tyres that may explode any minute.
David-A (@david-a)
6th October 2013, 1:09
@silence – Exactly, and one even exploded right in front of Alonso’s eyes.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 1:11
@david-a Yep, and Massa’s own tyre cost him a shot at the podium.
I’m amazed by how many people ignore (or choose to ignore) this.
Broom (@)
6th October 2013, 1:15
I mentioned it in the 2nd paragraph. However Red-Bull, Mercedes and co were all complaining before Silverstone. I was just thinking of a hypothetical situation of what the conversation would be like if Alonso took Hembrey’s advice and asked Seb what to do.
bull mello (@bullmello)
6th October 2013, 0:46
Paul Hembery has done an admirable job in a difficult situation this season. Sad to see him now reduced to a – Liar liar pants on fire! – type response. Sometimes it is better to drive your tires onto the higher road.
Tifoso1989 (@tifoso1989)
6th October 2013, 0:54
I’m just wondering why Paul Hembery didn’t have the same bravery to answer critics especially when his company was tortured by the Red Bull PR machine, i’m not searching excuses to Fernando but Vettel himself was complaining about the tyre at the beginning of the year when other drivers like Fernando & Kimi were doing a better job in managing their tyres, we all know the pressure made by Dietrich Mateschitz and Bernie Ecclestone on Pirelli to bring last year’s tyres but i don’t know anything about an agreement that force Pirelli to defend Red Bull and attack the others
Kazihno (@kazinho)
6th October 2013, 0:58
Same here.
I’m wondering why Alonso hasn’t told Hembrey to go ask Michelin how to make tyres last longer than a single lap.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 1:06
@kazinho Pirelli is more than capable of making durable tyres. Just that Ecclestone told them not to.
And, when they were ready to make them more durable, Ferrari opposed it.
While I think that Hembrey’s comments are childish and stupid, a Ferrari driver is in no position to complain about the degration of the tyres.
matt90 (@matt90)
6th October 2013, 1:25
He didn’t tell them to produce tyres which can’t be pushed for a single full lap though.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 1:31
@matt90 He didn’t ask for exploding tyres, either, but when you ask for high-degrading tyres and allow minimal testing, you get results that nobody likes.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 1:03
@tifoso1989
“We all know” should be used to only post things that are actually true. If was Ecclestone himself who comm anded Pirelli to make high-degrading tyres, in order to bring more “spectacle” to F1. Which for a while they did.
“I asked Pirelli to make tyres that would not complete 50 per cent of a race – and that’s what they did.”
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/107564
Please make sure to check your facts before making allegations like that, it’s not the first time you’ve posted big falsehoods as truths.
Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys)
6th October 2013, 2:23
I think Hembrey is just frustrated. Pirelli took a lot of criticism for their tyres, but only made changes when there were issues with their construction. Now someone is criticising them again, even though Pirelli have only ever done what was asked if them. I think he’s just sick and tired of teams and drivers trying to put pressure on Pirelli to make tyres that suit them more than anyone else.
Kingshark (@kingshark)
6th October 2013, 3:15
Because Pirelli are Red Bull’s puppets.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 4:21
@kingshark Do you honestly believe that, or are you being sarcastic/making excuses for Red Bull’s succes?
Because I can’t fanthom any rational indication or reason for Pirelli to make what Red Bull, of all teams, want.
Kingshark (@kingshark)
6th October 2013, 4:55
I’m not making excuses for Red Bull’s success. They have been the best team for the past 4 years. That doesn’t change the fact that Pirelli were total cowards when confronted by Red Bull, yet have no problem attacking Alonso/Ferrari.
That does make Pirelli Red Bull’s puppets.
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 5:01
@kingshark That’s not even remotely close to how the expression “puppets” is supposed to be used.
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
6th October 2013, 5:54
@kingshark
I think that’s complete rubbish and totally unfair. Pirelli said many times they didn’t want to make changes because they could be seen as favouring Red Bull and pointed out to Red Bull that other people were happy with the tyres. The changes that were eventually made were on safety grounds.
Kingshark (@kingshark)
6th October 2013, 6:58
@keithcollantine
Those are examples of Pirelli trying to defend their tyres, not attacking another driver. There’s a big difference between the two.
I don’t remember Pirelli making smug/rude comments to Red Bull like they did to Alonso today, despite the fact that Red Bull criticized Pirelli far more often, and often far more harshly than Alonso did.
Poul Winther (@poul)
6th October 2013, 14:40
@keithcollantine
How can you keep rotating this as a fact? The changes that were eventually made were excused by safety gounds while Pirelli and Hembery repeatedly stated that there was no safety issue because it was only tread delaminations we saw!
Are the tyres much safer now by the way?
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 15:02
@keithcollantine
It’s not an excuse that tyres exploded in Silverstone. It’s not an excuse the drivers threatened to withdraw from the German GP if changes weren’t made. It’s not an excuse that all teams agreed a change was needed.
OmarR-Pepper (@)
6th October 2013, 1:01
Breno (@austus)
6th October 2013, 1:18
If only Hembrey had some ground to stand on… But no, he and Pirelli have been a major focus of attention this year for the wrong reasons. He should stay quiet and guarantee this wont happen again in 2014.
dam00r (@dam00r)
6th October 2013, 1:25
Alonso to McLaren, Hulkenberg and Kimi to Ferrari, Sutil to Lotus, D’ambrosio to Force India?
dam00r (@dam00r)
6th October 2013, 1:26
also.. Kovalainen and Barrichello to Caterham?
Chris (@tophercheese21)
6th October 2013, 1:30
Ooooohh Alonso, apply cold water to the area of burn.
Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys)
6th October 2013, 1:37
Korea is already getting financial concessions for their race. I can’t imagine that Bernie would grant more, not unless he *really* wants the race to go ahead.
I think the Korean Grand Prix will go down in history as a comedy of errors. It started out as a good idea, and I really think Hyundai could have started up an engine programme. But then the recession hit and Hyundai lost a lot of money. They’ve made up the ground they lost, but tthey’re entering the WRC instead. From there, thing just went downhill: the circuit was built out in the middle of nowhere, the circuit got a late revision that added painfully pointless hairpin-chicanes, and the promoters completely failed to promote the race.
It’s a shame, because there is actually a good circuit in Korea – the top half, from Turn 3 to Turn 12. Just remove the hairpin-chicanes and you’ve got a short, fast and flowing circuit that could easily become an instant classic (but it’s too short).
Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys)
6th October 2013, 1:46
I’m curious as to who McLaren have signed for their technical team. Mercedes have the royal flush of technical directors from other teams, while Ferrari have recruited James Allison and recalled Rory Byrne, and Red Bull won’t let go of Adrian Newey (who has made it clear he doesn’t want to leave, anyway). So I think McLaren has gone after the likes of Sauber’s Matt Morris (who they already have) – designers who are starting to make a name for themselves, but haven’t reached the same echelons as Newey and Byrne. I’m guessing they might have gone after Williams’ Jason Sommerfield, who worked alongside Mike Coughlan to solve a lot of the FW33’s problems last year.
Punchy (@punchy)
6th October 2013, 2:02
Perhaps Mr Hembery should ask team Red Bull why they are winning races and why every driver would like to drive for them, then ask all the drivers why most of them don’t like Pirelli tyres ?
tmax (@tmax)
6th October 2013, 2:49
Ouch that hurts…
Some strong words from Alonso about Ferrari too. Does that mean McLaren return is immenint !!!!!
Travis (@mcmerctn)
6th October 2013, 3:05
Love that answer Paul Hembery gave Alonso. Not a big fan of tact, so I enjoyed reading that, but certainly not the most PR-friendly thing for him to say.
Diego (@ironcito)
6th October 2013, 3:30
Hembery clearly didn’t understand what Alonso was saying. After reading Alonso’s comments, I have to agree with what he said.
Patrickl (@patrickl)
6th October 2013, 11:10
Exactly. It’s like people are just reading the headline and write down their knee jerk reaction.
I’ve said it before Pirelli got selected as F1’s sole tyre manufacturer on the basis of their promise to create fast degrading tyres. It’s ludicrous. Unfortunately it actually turned out even worse than I imagined.
Apart from Red Bull with it’s aero demi-god Newey, all the other teams are on some sort of F1 version of musical chairs. Spin the wheel of the tyre lottery and see on which team it stops.
Even more stupid is the way they try to squash complaints. At some point even the FIA stepped in to forbid drivers to complain that they can’t race anymore on these “tyres”.
iAltair (@)
6th October 2013, 4:11
Dam, and I thought Michelin will come in for 2014.
That reply is just uncalled for.
Hamilfan (@hamilfan)
6th October 2013, 4:39
Wait a second , I am not sure that Pirelli is a great smart brand . What they could have done is done a good theoretical analysis and told Mr E , hey the tyres can’t be made without sufficient testing as:
1) different cars react differently on the long run
2) It may not work similarly in different circuits ( I mean it in a really bad way ) .
I am not saying I know for sure but for all we know maybe they did that perfectly and Mr E said he is willing to take the chance for some excitement ( then it’s Mr. E and FIA to blame ). Does anyone know how much pireli is being paid in all of this ?
Pirelli and FIA ruined it for all of us as FIA locked pirelli in an intangible situation and they said okay lets keep playing and hope things turn out well instead of pressing for a change .
yuya (@john-locke)
6th October 2013, 4:46
Why Keith didn’t pick up “Rosberg and Button are unhappy about Vettel’s words (Whilst there’s a lot of people hanging their b***s in the pool on Fridays, we’re still working very hard and pushing very hard so that we have a strong race.)
You always try to make people dislike Alonso, but you never does that for Vettel lol
Always ALonso Alonso Alonso ……
Albert (@)
6th October 2013, 5:04
He already posted that here
https://www.racefans.net/2013/10/05/f1-fanatic-round-up-0510/
Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine)
6th October 2013, 5:55
@john-locke As @silence points out, it was in yesterday’s round-up.
David Bretz (@cynical)
6th October 2013, 5:26
I don’t see how Ferrari and Lotus have been adversely affected by the tyre change since they managed to get on the podium at the last race by making a 2 stop strategy work when others couldn’t.
rwshep (@lonso)
6th October 2013, 19:53
If there’s anybody out there reading this who actually talks to Paul Hembrey, please tell him that his comments in response to what Alonso observed are juvenile. I am a guy who defended Pirelli when many F1 fans were were dumping all over them earlier this season. These fans said that Pirelli makes deficient tires for road cars in addition to dumping on the Pirelli F1 program. I argued that they don’t, in part based on my experience driving a road car with Pirelli tires. For that, I am subjected to Hembrey making a silly comment, claiming that Alonso should talk to Vettel about how a driver gets the maximum out of the current tires. Though Hembrey works in F1, I have to question the quality of his vision or ability to comprehend what he does see. He’s apparently unaware that in the early part of the season when everything wasn’t going Vettel’s way, he was the poster boy for sniveling about the tires. Vettel wins for one reason and one reason only: the car which the world caffeine king pays Adrian Newey to design and the bias in Vettel’s favour which is built into the team at Red Bull. On top of that, and this is a point that no-one seems to comprehend or challenge within the ranks of F1, Mateschitz owns two teams with Toro Rosso acting as an in season testing team for Red Bull, a situation that no other team enjoys. While other teams could do the same and might be criticized for not doing so, this situation, involving sniveling, intra-team favouritism, and an in season test team, at least calls into question the real value of Vettel as a driver vis a vis Hembrey’s response to Alonso’s comments. On top of all this, we now have knowledgable F1 insiders like Niki Lauda and Giancarlo Minardi questioning the legality of Vettel’s car and whether cheating is occurring. In this context, Hembrey looks and sounds foolish. Alonso doesn’t need any pointers from Vettel on driving a Formula One car. Not now, not ever.